Sowing the Seeds of Prosperity
Approving genetically modified crops in India
Authors
Prashant Narang, Tarini Sudhakar, Manickam Valliappan

On 17 February 2022, farmers in Ahmednagar, Maharashtra chose to go against the law and plant Bt Brinjal, a genetically modified (GM) variant of the crop.

Anil Ghanwat, leader of the Swatantra Bharat Party and ex-president of the Shetkari Sanghatan, explaining the rationale behind the protest in Ahmednagar on 17 February 2022

Overview of the agriculture and farming sector, focusing on the challenges faced

We are staring in the face of a food crisis

By 2050, the world will need to produce 60-70% more food than what it is already producing to feed an anticipated population of 9.3 billion people.

Current Production

60-70%

Additional produce need by 2050

With India’s population set to reach 1.7 billion by 2050, its annual domestic food production must increase to 333 million tonnes against the current level of 252 million tonnes.

Current production
252 miltonnes
Production needed
333 miltonnes
GM in India and overview of the challenges faced for approval

GM crops, with their ability to cut pesticide usage, boost yield, provide greater nutrition, and decrease overall burden on environment are the way ahead.

In India, Bt Cotton is the only GM crop to be approved for commercial release. Since its approval in 2002, no other crop has been able to survive the unending barrage of regulatory challenges.

At the core of this, is Aruna Rodrigues and Others v. Union of India and Others where the petitioner pushed for a complete ban on introducing GM in India, without raising their complaints to the appellate authority for GM-related issues.

Why the Supreme Court entertained this petition is not clear, but in 2012, a Technical Expert Committee appointed by the Court for this matter called for a 10-year moratorium on field trials for GM crops in its interim report. It was only in late 2021 that field trials for two varieties of Bt Brinjal were allowed again.

Negative public perception of GM crops shadow any effort to build a pathway towards commercial use despite extensive studies that prove that GM crops-

  1. Are safe to eat
  2. Result in higher yields through less crop damage
  3. Are less environmentally harmful than their non-GM counterparts
  4. Boost farmer incomes by cutting costs

Mahendra Sajan Patil says he frequently advises farmers to plant GM crops if they are able to find GM seeds in the market because that is the only way to secure their future. He also adds that until there is advancement in agriculture technology, farmers will face the brunt of the crisis. His statement demonstrates the fear amongst agriculturalists and farmers regarding being able to sustain their practices. 

Navnath Sopan Jadhav from Maharashtra says that today they have planted Bt Brinjal and tomorrow it will be another GM crop, let the government put them in jail for this protest. He explains that an ordinary crop planted in India and its GM equivalent planted in an international country have a difference in yield with the GM crop giving 5 times the yield of the ordinary crop. He questions why the government allows the import of GM soybean if it is considered harmful. His statement shows the growing stamina of the GM crop movement amongst farmers, who are ready to face legal retaliation in their journey to obtain approval for GM seeds. 

regulatory setup that applicants must go through for approval to use GM seeds

Applicants need to move through a four-step process to obtain approval for commercial use of GM crops

Laboratory

Applicant carries out multiple safety assessments such as food, feed, and environmental safety experiments in the lab and open field containments. This serves as primary data that is reviewed for granting multi-location and large-scale field trials to assess the biosafety of the crop.

Field Trials

After the primary data is reviewed by the respective authorities, field trials are conducted by the applicant in two stages: the Biosafety Research Level (BRL) trial I and II.

Environmental Release

Upon review of the field trial data, Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) accords approval for environmental release following agronomic and biosafety assessments in consultation with Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) and other committees.

Commercialization

Commercial release is then granted by the GEAC only if the crop is found to be safe for both humans and the environment.

Bt Cotton is the only GM crop that has been commercially released in India. It was only in September 2021 that field trials for two varieties of Bt Brinjal were allowed to begin after a ten-year long moratorium.

Regulatory set up to approve GM crops in India

Advisory

Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee(RDAC)

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology

Review developments in Biotechnology at national and international levels

Recommend suitable and appropriate safety regulations for india in recombinant research, use and applications

Regulatory /Approval

Genetic Engineering Appraisel Committee(GEAC)

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

Oversees field trials and reviews biosafety data in consultation with other committees

Serves as the apex body that accords approval for large scale environmental release of GMOs

Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation(RCGM)

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and technology

Reviews primary data and issues approvals for biosafety field trials

Monitor the safety related aspects in respect of on-ongoing research projects and activities involving genetically engineered organisms/hazardous microorganisms

Institutional Biosafety Committee(IBSC)

Formed by the research organisation/applicant with a nominee from DBT

Serves as a nodal point for interactions within the organisation to implement biosafety regulations

Monitoring

State Biotechnology Coordinatiom Comittee(SBCC)

Ministry of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and technology

Monitor GMO avtivities at the state level and coordinate with the Centre on implementation

District level Committee(DLC)

Ministry of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and technology

Monitor safety regulations of installations engaged in the use of GMOs  in research and application at the district level

the interest groups and their standing on the issues of GM seeds use in India

Several interest groups affect the process of receiving regulatory approval for GM crops

Agriculture corporations

“The environment for science is very negative at the regulatory level because with all the steps that the government has taken it is to not encourage innovation and agriculture is getting brunt of it.”
Usha Barwale Zehr, Chief Technology Officer of the family-run Mahyco group

Anti-GM Farmers Organizations

The Bhartiya Kisan Sangh has time and again demanded that products and byproducts of agricultural commodities involving GM technology/event at any stage should not allowed, even for import, without a robust a policy guideline in place.
Bhartiya Kisan Sangh

"We are aware of the scientific evidence on the health, environmental, and economic risks posed by GM technology. This is why GMOs have been rejected by India’s citizens, led by farmer unions such as ours, as we saw in the case of both Bt Brinjal and HT Mustard. Most of our state governments have also rejected GM technology. For farmers, the threat of corporate capture of our food system is too great. We see GM foods as a ploy by the biotech industry, especially when we have successfully managed to stall the commercial cultivation permission for GM crops in India.” 
Rakesh Tikait, Samyukt Kisan Morcha

Environmental and Social Activists

"Any kind of GM food in India is a threat to health of our people, to our environment, and to the diverse food cultures of India." 
Kavita Kuruganti, social activist

“Farmers are dying because Monsanto is making profits—by owning life that it never created but it pretends to create. That is why we need to reclaim the seed. That is why we need to get rid of the G.M.O.s. That is why we need to stop the patenting of life.”
Vandana Shiva anti-GMO activist

Related Industries interest groups (beekeeping industry)

“Allowing GM mustard will jeopardise this sector and affect livelihood of half a million farmers. Our more than 60 per cent of honey comes from mustard and we export around 40 per cent of total produced honey.” 
Dev Vrat Sharma, a honey trader

Pro-GM Farmers Organizations

“Farmers have for long been deprived of agricultural innovations. We can’t be overlooking the fact that genetically modified crops need less pesticide and also help with weed control, leading to lower labour cost.”
Ajit Narde, a farmer and head of the technology cell at the Shetkari Sanghatana

The Swatantra Bharat Party (SBP) is committed to the health, wealth and success of all Indians. We want the food to be safe. To SBP, the fact that growing GM crops might improve farmers’ incomes is irrelevant, if food safety is compromised. On this threshold issue, the best of India’s and the world’s scientists are on our side. Food regulators in all developed countries, not just in India, have declared GM crops to be safe. Trillions of GM-based meals have been consumed by animals and people around the world for nearly three decades: Not a single adverse effect has been identified.
Anil Ghanwat, president, Swatantra Bharat Party, former president of Shetkari Sanghatana and member of the Supreme Court Committee on Farm Laws

Join us in our call to action for an independent regulatory body to govern approvals of GM crops in India.

India should look to its neighboring country of Bangladesh to see how successful commercial use of GM crops can help farmers. Bangladesh approved the use Bt Brinjal in 2013 has helped farmers cut their pesticide use by 62% and increased their profits six-fold.

Decoupling politics and ideologically-driven positions from the science on GM is key if India were to adopt technologies that boost its agricultural ecosystem and benefit farmers, consumers, and society at large. 

Authors

Dr Prashant Narang

Dr Prashant Narang heads the Research team at Centre for Civil Society (CCS). His most significant contributions at CCS include ease of doing business reforms recommendations and the Street Vendor Compliance Index. Having written journal papers on the legal sector reforms and the Right to Education Act, his current interest areas are the rule of law, institutions, and the constitutional right to carry on business and trade in India.

Tarini Sudhakar

Tarini Sudhakar is a Senior Associate and works on education, environment, and agriculture at Centre for Civil Society. She will be pursuing her Masters in Economics this fall and is keen to explore the intersection of law and economics. She studied History from Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi.

Manickam Valliappan

Manickam Valliappan is a final year undergraduate studying Economics and Politics at the University of London. He is an aspiring policy researcher with interests in political economy and international trade and finance. His work has also been published in media outlets such as The Hindu, Financial Express, and The Daily Guardian.

Share this story